In all of us there is a hunger, marrow deep, to know our heritage, to know who we are and where we have come from. Without this enriching knowledge, there is a hollow yearning. No matter what our attainments in life, there is a vacuum and emptiness and a most disquieting loneliness. -Alex Haley
The best metaphor I found to explain the existential emptiness of my being an adoptee in a consumer-driven society is an empty cereal box. It exists without purpose or reason after it’s been emptied of its cereal. The “cereal,” of course, was the purpose of the box, gave it meaning and fulfillment when the insides matched the outside (identity). So, instead of a soapbox, this is my cerealbox.
For me, being an adoptee is being cut off from existing comfortably in my own body because “I” don’t know who “I” am. It also means being disconnected from the rest of the world because the link to my past was severed and continuity was stolen from me. What non-adoptees experience as integral to their being, I cannot imagine. I am invisible, empty, lost, alone, and anxious, no matter how many people love me. For me, no past means no meaningful future.
My experience as an adoptee has been that all my life I’ve faked my existence. I pretend to be whole and happy in order to function. My lack of identity is invisible. I look like any other person. I could be anyone. I have no identity of my own, so I learn to act, learn to live as a chameleon. There is nothing inside–no roots, no foundation, no continuity, no trust.
The dominant belief of society is that all it takes to be happy is to grow up in a family that provides for you and loves you. What is denied is the elemental and eternal bond that exists between the natural mother and child. When the baby is taken away, both live apart, each missing the other like a severed limb–a severed soul. Continuity has been broken forever. A profound and invisible connection no longer flows between them. Nothing is ever quite right afterward. Ever.
Everyone’s a stranger to me, including myself. Even after a reunion, nothing will ever be as it should have been for me, but life goes on. The lack of history with my natural family members caused a rift that nothing, not even time, can fill, creating a void at the center of my being. My life-long hunger is to go home, but that home never existed, doesn’t exist, and never will exist on this Earth. In my daily life I live in my own private despair that no drug or therapy that can heal, even with the best of intentions.
For as long as I can remember I’ve always apologized for my existence, as if I really don’t belong here. And the literal dialog between having been taken from my mother (my All Self from conception through now) and my gut is that I really SHOULDN’T be here. My very existence was a mistake. I’ve never felt settled, included, at ease. I fear rejection as a form of death.
If you’re not an adoptee, I urge you to read Stephen Fitzpatrick’s seven articles that describe his personal agony as an adoptee. They can take you by the hand and show you what happens after a mother is coerced to give up her baby. Until you read them, your attitude toward “poorly adjusted” adoptees (like myself) will probably continue to be “you can get over it if you try.”
Often non-adoptees who read what I write leave comments that could be summed up as, “Big baby. What a whiner. Grow up and get a spine. Be grateful that you got a good home and parents that loved you. Get on with your life for crying out loud! ” Their reaction is understandable. Adoptees are big babies. We will forever be locked in our infanthood, since the state doesn’t recognize us as adults with the human right (not discretionary privilege) of self-knowledge and identity.
In my opinion, what I call “vanity adoptions” or unnecessary adoptions, are a form of colonization, an occupation, a quiet genocide sanctioned by society to favor its well-off members. And yes, the world probably has more pressing problems than the loss and grief caused by vanity adoptions. But I suspect that vanity adoptions are just another symptom of the sickness that caused the other problems in the first place.; I suspect that if society would climb out of its black hole of denial and unravel the cause, the symptoms would take care of themselves.
The opinions expressed on this blog are based on my own experiences and research. You’re welcome to disagree with any of the content you find here based on your own experience and research. But please don’t just regurgitate what others have fed you all your life. I invite you to question what you’ve been told and to instead consider what YOU feel, think, and know about the subject of adoption.
I wish to thank Rhonda, another adoptee, for bringing the YouTube video “Bury My Lovely” by October Project to my attention. It has special meaning for her because it was filmed in an old Victorian house where she once lived, and her relatives were cast as players. Like many of us affected by adoption, I’ve always found Rhonda and her writing to be special. Although the video may or may not be about the soul death caused by adoption, I must include it on my “about” page because its opening images are the most powerful I’ve ever seen. To me, the images combined with OP’s haunting music capture exactly what it feels like to be adopted.


November 20, 2008 at 3:26 pm |
Hi, I just wanted to say that I found your blog, and I’m an adoptee. So are two of my sisters. You’ve probably heard this before, but I don’t think you can really extend your personal experiences to all adoptees. I grew up knowing I was adopted, and I was okay with it. I was curious as hell about who my birthparents were, and I knew that one day I would go searching for them (I told my adoptive parents this early on and they were okay with it), but I never for a moment felt like my adoptive parents weren’t my parents, or that they were going to reject me. It was kind of the opposite, actually; Mom told me years later that she and Dad were terrified that my birthmother would change her mind and take me back.
I’m not saying it was all tea and roses, though. I mean, I went through some rough times and a few tears not knowing who my birthparents were, but it wasn’t a horrible disfiguring inner scar, either. I did a search for my birthparents a few years ago, we met and hit it off, and now they keep in touch with my adoptive family like an extra aunt and uncle (they ended up getting married years after they had me). Even though I love ‘em, they’re not my real mom and dad. My real mom and dad are, to me, the ones who raised me. I’ve talked to my sisters about being adopted, and they feel pretty much the same way. One wants to search for her birthparents sometime the future, the other doesn’t really have an interest in it, and neither of them have any issues with rejection, abandonment, or feeling worthless because of being adopted. We’ve also been in contact with other adoptees, both in person and online. The overwhelming majority of them seem to have experiences like ours, and are glad they ended up with the families who raised them.
I’m not saying all adoptions are perfect. Some have problems, as you yourself can probably attest. But it’s unfair to say that all adoptees will be horribly traumatized and ruined for life.
November 23, 2008 at 4:35 pm |
Rarely I read posts and comments from other adoptees who, like you, say they feel little or no trauma about being adopted. I would never presume to speak for or argue with them or you.
But on my blog I tell it like it is for ME (although my writing style does tend to be inclusive). That’s because the experiences of MOST adoptees I’ve met online (as well as first moms and dads) tend to parallel my own IN GENERAL (specifics are of course all different). By that I mean that when babies are separated from their biological mothers/families, never to have contact again, the majority undergo irreparable loss and grief, irregardless of how loving the adoptive families were and are.
I’m not making this up, Kat. There are countless books and websites devoted to the trauma of adoption separation. If you browse through the links on my Adoptee Blogs and First Moms and Dads pages, you might be amazed at the outpourings of anger and grief you will find there. To me you and your sisters seem like exceptions rather than the rule. If you were the rule, then organizations like Bastard Nation would never need to exist.
November 26, 2008 at 8:56 pm |
I think Kat needs to start her own blog so the world can truly know what it is like to be an adoptee. Oh wait. That’s not what she is saying is it?
I guess she just wanted to take a minute to put you in your place.
Naughty adoptee blogging about adoption.
Hmph!
My experience was actually very similar to Kat’s I have lovely adoptive parents. That doesn’t mean I liked being adopted or having a big question mark over my head my entire life.
I wish that instead of subtly trying to silence the adoptees who dare to speak and write of their own experiences, that people would try to listen and take it in and not try so hard to personalize everything.
Adoptees should have the right to tell their own truths and not be silenced by their own peers.
Keep on keeping on.
December 11, 2008 at 2:04 pm |
Can i get in touch with you about the possibility of reprinting one of your articles on a website?
cedartrees4@yahoo.com
December 27, 2008 at 9:31 pm |
issycat, did you read the entire “about” section?
I agree with you that each adoptee has their own experience and its great to blog about it and share with everyone. However, Kat is right, the author takes very generous liberties in lumping all adoptees together and making gross generalizations about all of us.
Kat isn’t trying to silence the author, however he/she is rightfully trying to stop the author from “speaking with one voice for all adoptees”. We all don’t share the same feelings as the author, and as such the author shouldn’t lump all adoptees by using phrases such as:
“To be an adoptee is to be…”
“The adopteeās life-long hunger is to”
“Adoptees are always apologizing”
Being an adoptee myself I:
1. Don’t feel empty inside
2. I can go home anytime I want too
3. I never apologize for my existence, why would I need too?
I blog myself and write about similar topics but from a different perspective. From the perspective that Kat and I seem to share a similar perspective. I have come across many blogs on this subject and I am just trying to “broaden my horizons” and learn as much as I can from people’s experiences.
December 29, 2008 at 12:04 am |
I can’t quite put my finger on what most irritates me about adoptees like InMySeoul who visit my blog and delineate my faults with such rightousness because they see themselves as superior beings. They are perfectly happy with themselves and their lives. They aren’t damaged and they feel no grief. They are perfectly fine. They “never apologize for [their] existence, why would [they] need to?”
Such rightousness! Such superiority! Nose-in-the-air flips me off. There, there. Feel better now?
Well InMySeoul, Kat, and all comers, I make no excuses for my generalizations. I stated quite clearly in a response to a comment that many adoptees I’ve encountered share my own feelings about being adopted, and there is no way I’m going to compromise my position. Excuse me, but where did I ever write “ALL adoptees?” If anyone bothered to actually read deep into my blog, they might not misread my entries as “gross generalizations.” But Kat and little Ms/Mr InMySeoul prefer to skim the surface and draw conclusions from ONE of my posts? Please.
True, in my “about” section I say “Adoptees [verb] [something],” which may seem like a “gross generalization” “lumping all adoptees together” to newcomers who don’t take time to read more of my blog. I am not alone in what I write. Take this random example.
They have no idea that I was privileged to be a part of an online adoption community for several years which included adoptees and first mothers who shared common ground–who supported each other and understood each other and in that support and understanding came a small measure of healing. The blogs of many of these individuals have either disappeared or have gone inactive, and I miss them. But that doesn’t negate the fact that my words still carry the weight of grief and support that we all shared for a brief time.
If new people like InMySeoul and Kat are uncomfortable with my words, then by all means, move along to other blogs that share your views. I doubt anything will “broaden [your] horizons,” because you’ve already made up your mind about adoptees who aren’t as perfect, knowledgeable, and balanced as you. You are, in any case, a walking contradiction. You say you “can go home anytime [you] want too [sic]“–and that means exactly…what?
Whatever it means, it vaguely reminds me of a junkie who says, “I can quit any time I want to.” I have one word for perfect people like you: Pathetic.
January 5, 2009 at 7:34 pm |
What about OPEN adoption??? What if you had regular contact every few months with you birthmom throughout your life? Would that have changed your opinion on anything? I am a birthmom who placed my birthson almost three years ago. In that time I have visited nine times. I plan to have more visits if the adoptive parents will allow it. I want my birthson to always know where he came from and everything, even the firstdad gets to visit just like me.
I feel very confused by your blog. Do you mean that nothing that your adoptive parents did for you brought you any joy or happiness?
I want to know if you think that OPEN adoption would have the same consiquences of ’soul death’.
January 6, 2009 at 11:56 am |
Cindy – Sorry to have confused you. I’m still working out my own feelings about what it means to be an adoptee since I was three days old, so I may not always offer rational statements. I can’t say whether or not having regular contact with my natural mother would have changed my feelings, since that never happened. You don’t give much detail about your circumstances (how old your son was when you gave him up), but I read that you seem to be in control of your life and your decisions about your child. If so, I congratulate you, and I mean that sincerely. Your son is very lucky to have you in his life.
My adoptive parents did the best they could given that the knowledge and sensitivity about adoption that’s coming out now wasn’t a part of larger society back then. By that I mean that, just as many adoptees fear they will hurt their adoptive parents if they even mention a desire to find their natural mother, so they say nothing in deference to the adoptive parents, smothering their own needs.
My adoptive parents provided a safe and secure home. They gave me advantages I would probably never have had, had my natural mother kept me. I do believe they loved me, and they never physically abused me. But regardless how much they may have loved and cared for me, I was always acutely aware that something profound was missing, and I was never able to fully return their love. Shall we blame the child? Shall we say the child is damaged?
Would my natural mother and adoptive parents have agreed on “open adoption” if it had been available in the state where they lived back then? Any answer would be speculation. I can’t ask them because they’re all dead.
The best answer I can offer you at this point in my understanding is that open adoption or not, regardless of circumstances, nature forms a deep, psychological unity between the natural mother and her child both within and outside the womb.
Each mother may feel differently about giving up her child, but for each child,losing the Motherself within the first year of life means that (in my own experience and in that of many other adoptees I’ve met online, with the exception of “adjusted adoptees”) the Childself can’t feel a sense of belonging, forever seeking what was lost. There is always that nagging, hollow emptiness where that solid sense of Self-containment should have been.
In the case of open adoption, was the child allowed to remain in close physical contact with the natural mother the first nine months of his life? If so, then I believe that open adoption isn’t as harmful If he was taken at birth, I guarantee you, regardless of your visits, there’s something broken inside him, even if he’s too young to sort out his feelings.
Beyond the broken psychology of the adoptee given up in the first year of life, I encourage everyone to read the truth about open adoptions in general at http://www.originscanada.org/open_adoption.html
February 17, 2009 at 7:00 am |
I just started reading your site. My wife and I are adoptive parents and have two girls. They have known from day one that they were adopted, it’s hard to hide it with mixed heritage, but we wouldn’t have if they looked like splitting images of us. We are starting to go through the process again for a large sibling group. I read your 15 reasons to never let your baby go, but in our case, it’s not an option for them to go back. We have selected kids in the past and the parental rights were still in tact, and the Birth mom wanted another chance and we applauded them for giving it to them. This case is different, there are no more chances, the tear is complete, the hurt is done, and we realize all the things they will challenge themselves with. Have you written any in your blog about what we as adoptive parents should do to make it the best it can be. We speak openly and in a non-defaming way about their birth mom and we maintain visits with people in their lives that were important and that still want to be part of their lives. But from your side, what else should adoptive parents do.
Thank you..
February 17, 2009 at 10:50 am |
ERC–I’m grateful that you have expressed yourself here on my blog. Your open-mindedness is the root of the answer to your question. As an adoptee, I’ve been seen as being closed minded, but actually it’s a defense mechanism that’s interfered with my ability to learn from well-meaning people. I can learn from open-minded folks like you just as you can learn from us adoptees.
Anyway, you didn’t go into detail about your situation, but it seems to me that the few things you do mention about what you and your wife are doing are laudable. I will say that your use of the term “birth mom” indicates the general mindset that points to the implications within a consumer society; that is, that the child’s biological mother is a convenient baby-making machine. I can’t blame you for that, only ask that you consider the words that you use and what they mean.
Open and honest dialog with your adopted child(ren) is the best thing you can possibly give to him/her/them. Too often this is lacking to protect the adults, both the biological and the adoptive. Lack of open honesty results in secrecy. Secrecy is the crazy-making bludgeon used on adoptees by society in order to capitalize on and control adoptees. You will no doubt read blogs and essays by other adoptees who swear their experience has been great and that they have no need to search for their origins. I can’t speak for them, but I always wonder about the honesty and possible denial behind such statements. Perhaps I’m the one in the minority.
But your question what adoptive parents should do to make it the best it can be reflects to me that you are already doing something positive. If your adopted child asks questions that feel scary to you, please understand that that child is coming from a child’s perspective, i.e., no agenda behind the words. That child is seeking nourishment and support and trust from his or her caretakers, and isn’t this just a continuation of the parental role?
We need to be ultra-sensitive about what lurks behind language. We need to be ultra-sensitive about nuanced messages that we send with our answers to these questions. Children are exceptionally perceptive and they can read a million things behind a seemingly innocent reply–some which were unintended. That’s why it’s so important to remain open, honest, and receptive. I would say that is especially true with children who’ve been separated from their roots.
It’s important to keep in mind that all three parts of the adoption triangle are hurting and the tear is complete in all cases after the child has separated from the natural mother for any considerable length of time. This has been shown in many child development studies, so your case isn’t unique. I understand that a small number of adoptions are absolutely necessary, but these are a minority. In many cases the child could have remained within the natural family. My biggest rage is over the consumerization and colonization of children–that is, money and lack thereof is usually the decisive factor whether or not a mother can keep her child. And when she can’t, it’s money that forces her to give up the child to those in higher income brackets. This is called “adoption.”
Keeping these things in mind (don’t take my word for it–research with the open mind I know you have) as you raise your child(ren) will insure that you make things the best you can.
May 13, 2009 at 9:00 am |
love your blog, Luminaria ….
Celeste
May 13, 2009 at 9:01 am |
Love your blog, Luminaria … Best, Celeste
May 26, 2009 at 10:48 am |
I love your blog… and as an adoptee that recently came out of the fog, I still get rubbed the wrong way sometimes when someone says to me “So, you’re saying that your adoptive parents never made you happy?” Um, no, not never… but the bad certainly outweighed the good… and to be given up certainly didn’t help those matters cause I already felt like if my birth mom could give me up at a moment’s notice… so could these people… so dammit, I had better behave!!
Anyway, keep writing & thank you so much for your insight… Love to you!! My adoptee Sister! *hug*